Matthew H. Wolf
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 4
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 3
- Child and Adolescent Health 1
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
- Co-authors
- William B. Stiles (4 shared papers)Sherman A. James (4 shared papers)Samuel M. Putnam (4 shared papers)Robert H. Pantell (2 shared papers)Catherine Lewis (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Medical Care (2 papers)Journal of Pediatric Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Behavioral Medicine (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine Part A Medical Sociology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Matthew H. Wolf
6 papers receiving 604 citations
Matthew H. Wolf's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Family Practice 39
- General Health Professions 410
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 67
- Pharmacy 26
- Psychiatry and Mental health 68
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew H. Wolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew H. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew H. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew H. Wolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew H. Wolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew H. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew H. Wolf. The network helps show where Matthew H. Wolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Matthew H. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The medical interview satisfaction scale: Development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physician behavior Hit paper breakdown → | 1978 | 332 |
| 2 | 1979 | 183 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 75 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 12 |
About Matthew H. Wolf
Matthew H. Wolf is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Family Practice, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper), Medical Education and Admissions (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (39 citations), General Health Professions (410 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (67 citations), Pharmacy (26 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations). Matthew H. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William B. Stiles, Sherman A. James, Samuel M. Putnam, Robert H. Pantell and Catherine Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Social Science & Medicine Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology and Social Science & Medicine Part A Medical Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.