Matthew Fiander

661 citations
20 papers · 516 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Fiander

20 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers

Matthew Fiander
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 265
  • Clinical Psychology 284
  • Philosophy 74
  • General Health Professions 159
  • Social Psychology 119
Replace Sue Parkman with:
Sue Parkman United Kingdom
David L. Cutler United States
Gerald M. McDougall Canada
Lorna L. Moser United States
Joel Kanter United States
Helen Gilburt United Kingdom
Philip Sugarman United Kingdom
Walter Wills United Kingdom
Noam Trieman United Kingdom
Edward S. Casper United States
Matthew Fiander relative to Sue Parkman United Kingdom Sue Parkman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Sue Parkman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Fiander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Fiander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Fiander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Fiander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Fiander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Fiander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Fiander. The network helps show where Matthew Fiander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Fiander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Fiander Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Fiander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200472
2 200368
3 200057
4 199856
5 200054
6 200037
7 200037
8 200134
9 200220
10 200219
11 201417
12 200814
13 200010
14 20077
15 20034
16 19973
17 19973
18 20062
19 19961
20
Recording professional activities to aid economic evaluations of health and social care services 2007 in Unit costs of health and social care
20071

About Matthew Fiander

Matthew Fiander is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (265 citations), Clinical Psychology (284 citations), Philosophy (74 citations), General Health Professions (159 citations) and Social Psychology (119 citations). Matthew Fiander has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tom Burns, Sarah Byford, Max Marshall, Shôn Lewis, Austin Lockwood, Robert E. Drake, Thomas Fahy, Gregory J. McHugo, Julie Barber and Bernard Audini. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services, European Psychiatry, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Alcohol and Alcoholism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact