Matthew Farish

844 citations
27 papers · 425 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Farish

26 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Matthew Farish
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Geography, Planning and Development 175
  • Space and Planetary Science 29
  • History and Philosophy of Science 58
  • Sociology and Political Science 207
  • Urban Studies 19
Replace Elizabeth Baigent with:
Elizabeth Baigent United Kingdom
Daniel Clayton United Kingdom
Tina Loo Canada
David Buisseret United States
Diarmid A. Finnegan United Kingdom
Mark David Spence United States
Stephen W. Silliman United States
Veronica della Dora United Kingdom
James Deetz United States
M. J. Wise United Kingdom
Matthew Farish relative to Elizabeth Baigent United Kingdom Elizabeth Baigent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Elizabeth Baigent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Farish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Farish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Farish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Farish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Farish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Farish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Farish. The network helps show where Matthew Farish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Farish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Farish Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Farish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006102
2 200642
3 200734
4 201329
5 200429
6 200927
7 201724
8 200522
9 200319
10 200515
11 200115
12 201514
13 200510
14 20179
15 20036
16 20106
17 20084
18 20124
19 20153
20 20153

About Matthew Farish

Matthew Farish is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (7 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Space exploration and regulation (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (175 citations), Space and Planetary Science (29 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (58 citations), Sociology and Political Science (207 citations) and Urban Studies (19 citations). Matthew Farish has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Trevor J. Barnes, P. Whitney Lackenbauer, Guy Baeten, Mark Boyle, Lauren Rickards, Kim England, James D. Sidaway, Mary Gilmartin, John Paul Catungal and Felix Driver. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Historical Geography, The Professional Geographer, Dialogues in Human Geography, Cultural Geographies and Isis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact