Daniel Clayton

773 citations
44 papers · 380 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Clayton

38 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Daniel Clayton
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Geography, Planning and Development 169
  • Anthropology 86
  • History and Philosophy of Science 39
  • Urban Studies 30
  • Cultural Studies 36
Replace Anne Godlewska with:
Anne Godlewska Canada
Karen M. Morin United States
Tina Loo Canada
David Buisseret United States
Oscar Salemink Algeria
Robert Aldrich Australia
Vera Norwood United States
Greg Dening Australia
Patricia Nelson Limerick United States
Rosita Henry Australia
Daniel Clayton relative to Anne Godlewska Canada Anne Godlewska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Anne Godlewska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Clayton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Clayton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Clayton. The network helps show where Daniel Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Clayton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Clayton Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Clayton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200150
2 200045
3 201241
4 200622
5 200019
6 200318
7 201218
8 200518
9 201916
10 202016
11 200515
12 202112
13 201912
14 200010
15 20208
16 20157
17 20206
18 20146
19 20015
20 20214

About Daniel Clayton

Daniel Clayton is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Anthropology and History, having authored 44 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (13 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (7 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (3 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers), Canadian Identity and History (3 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (169 citations), Anthropology (86 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (39 citations), Urban Studies (30 citations) and Cultural Studies (36 citations). Daniel Clayton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tina Loo, Satish Kumar, Trevor J. Barnes, Charles R. Warren, Stephanie Schnurr, Michael E. Harkin, Tariq Jazeel, Robert McDonald, Douglas C. Tozer and Namrata Shrestha. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Historical Geography, Scottish Geographical Journal, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, Annals of the American Association of Geographers and Progress in Human Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact