Matthew E. Smith

78 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

Matthew E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Otorhinolaryngology 380
  • Genetics 116
  • Sensory Systems 27
  • Reproductive Medicine 46
  • Surgery 218
Replace Hisham Khalil with:
Hisham Khalil United Kingdom
A. P. Coatesworth United Kingdom
Angelo Ghidini Italy
Desmond A. Nunez United Kingdom
David W. J. Côté Canada
M. W. Yung United Kingdom
Gadi Fishman Israel
Marc A. Tewfik Canada
James M. Chow United States
Nicolas Y. Busaba United States
Matthew E. Smith relative to Hisham Khalil United Kingdom Hisham Khalil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Hisham Khalil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew E. Smith. The network helps show where Matthew E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Matthew E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201587
2 201678
3 201864
4 201252
5
Sympathetic uveitis following evisceration.
197349
6
Delayed release of drain in total knee replacement reduces blood loss. A prospective randomised study.
200634
7 201733
8 201526
9 201825
10 202023
11 196923
12 201722
13 202121
14 201720
15 202020
16 201919
17 201418
18 201717
19 201917
20 201717

About Matthew E. Smith

Matthew E. Smith is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Oncology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (20 papers), Vascular Anomalies and Treatments (9 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (6 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (380 citations), Genetics (116 citations), Sensory Systems (27 citations), Reproductive Medicine (46 citations) and Surgery (218 citations). Matthew E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include James R. Tysome, Daniel Scoffings, Manohar Bance, Richard J. Williams, Neil Donnelly, T.E. Sanders, A. E. Maumenee, Anuja Dokras, Mary D. Sammel and Andrea H. Roe. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, Clinical Otolaryngology, Otology & Neurotology, PLoS ONE and European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact