Matthew Dean
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Renal and related cancers 4
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 3
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 10
- Co-authors
- Joanna E. Burdette (16 shared papers)David A. Davis (4 shared papers)Daniel D. Lantvit (7 shared papers)Angela Russo (8 shared papers)Brian T. Murphy (2 shared papers)Tova M. Bergsten (2 shared papers)Ziting Chen (3 shared papers)Laura M. Sanchez (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Letters (4 papers)Animal Reproduction Science (2 papers)Oncogene (2 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgypt
In The Last Decade
Matthew Dean
33 papers receiving 543 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Reproductive Medicine 172
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 42
- Agronomy and Crop Science 57
- Immunology 99
- Cancer Research 62
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Dean. The network helps show where Matthew Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 10 |
About Matthew Dean
Matthew Dean is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Agronomy and Crop Science and Genetics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (10 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (10 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (8 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (6 papers), Renal and related cancers (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (172 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (42 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (57 citations), Immunology (99 citations) and Cancer Research (62 citations). Matthew Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Joanna E. Burdette, David A. Davis, Daniel D. Lantvit, Angela Russo, Brian T. Murphy, Tova M. Bergsten, Ziting Chen, Laura M. Sanchez, Katherine E. Zink and Jack Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Letters, Animal Reproduction Science, Oncogene, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.