Matthew D. Powers

1.1k citations
36 papers · 731 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew D. Powers

34 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

Matthew D. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 301
  • Global and Planetary Change 329
  • Insect Science 119
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 69
  • Soil Science 63
Replace Jean Liénard with:
Jean Liénard France
Michael Karl United States
Minna Blomqvist Finland
Athanasios Papaioannou Greece
Nigel J. Livingston Canada
L. D. Kellogg United States
Mingze Li China
K. Okada Japan
Jacques Lauga France
Yuri Shendryk Australia
Matthew D. Powers relative to Jean Liénard France Jean Liénard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Jean Liénard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew D. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew D. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew D. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew D. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew D. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew D. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew D. Powers. The network helps show where Matthew D. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew D. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew D. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Matthew D. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017104
2 200985
3 201179
4 201245
5 201043
6 198443
7 200932
8 200830
9 200930
10 200921
11 200620
12 201517
13 201715
14 200914
15 201814
16 200813
17 200713
18 200913
19 200812
20 201711

About Matthew D. Powers

Matthew D. Powers is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Atmospheric Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (12 papers), Forest ecology and management (10 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (5 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (301 citations), Global and Planetary Change (329 citations), Insect Science (119 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (69 citations) and Soil Science (63 citations). Matthew D. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Brian J. Palik, John T. Cavanaugh, Christopher R. Webster, Kurt S. Pregitzer, Randall K. Kolka, Martin F. Jurgensen, John B. Bradford, Linda M. Nagel, John A. Vucetich and Joseph K. Bump. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Ecosphere, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Journal of Field Robotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact