Matteo Floris

4.5k citations
57 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Matteo Floris

56 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Matteo Floris
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 464
  • Cancer Research 167
  • Molecular Biology 711
  • Pharmacology 77
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 69
Replace William D. Pennie with:
William D. Pennie United States
Wibke E. Diederich Germany
Guanghui Hu China
Shan Chang China
Rui Xu China
Paweł Siedlecki Poland
Xiaohua Ma China
Yanmin Zhang China
Jeng‐Sen Tseng Taiwan
Matteo Floris relative to William D. Pennie United States William D. Pennie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
William D. Pennie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matteo Floris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matteo Floris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matteo Floris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matteo Floris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matteo Floris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matteo Floris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matteo Floris. The network helps show where Matteo Floris may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matteo Floris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matteo Floris Line = papers co-authored together Matteo Floris links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006396
2 2020101
3 201480
4 201960
5 200857
6 201449
7 201149
8 201946
9 201845
10 202037
11 201834
12 201231
13
Overlapping syndromes in laminopathies: a meta-analysis of the reported literature.
201331
14 201230
15 200726
16 202026
17 200925
18 201123
19 202021
20 202019

About Matteo Floris

Matteo Floris is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science and Genetics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (13 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (5 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (464 citations), Cancer Research (167 citations), Molecular Biology (711 citations), Pharmacology (77 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (69 citations). Matteo Floris has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rajarshi Guha, Christian Hoppe, Stefan Kühn, Egon Willighagen, Christoph Steinbeck, Stefano Moro, Maria Laura Idda, Valeria Lodde, Maristella Steri and Stefania Olla. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Informatics, Viruses, Biomolecules, BMC Genomics and Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact