Matt King
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Papers in
-
- Free Will and Agency 11
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 2
- Philosophy 11
- War, Ethics, and Justification 7
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 1
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Ethics (2 papers)European Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Journal of Moral Philosophy (1 paper)Neuroethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Matt King
13 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Philosophy 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 128
- General Decision Sciences 5
- Social Psychology 21
- Information Systems and Management 5
Countries citing papers authored by Matt King
This map shows the geographic impact of Matt King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matt King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt King. The network helps show where Matt King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Matt King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 7 | Manipulation Arguments and the Moral Standing to Blame | 2015 | 8 |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 1 |
About Matt King
Matt King is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 157 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (11 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (7 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (91 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (128 citations), General Decision Sciences (5 citations), Social Psychology (21 citations) and Information Systems and Management (5 citations). Matt King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Carruthers and Joshua May. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Ethics, European Journal of Philosophy, Journal of Moral Philosophy and Neuroethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.