Matilde Breth‐Petersen

563 citations
9 papers · 351 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Matilde Breth‐Petersen

9 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Matilde Breth‐Petersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 117
  • General Health Professions 71
  • Social Psychology 60
  • Health 20
  • Clinical Psychology 51
Replace Kate Grailey with:
Kate Grailey United Kingdom
Lianzheng Yu China
Russell Jones Australia
Caroline Wellbery United States
Yuchai Huang China
Dolors Juvinyà Spain
Amin Babaei Pouya Iran
Syed Moniruzzaman Sweden
Sally Engler United States
Viviane Elisângela Gomes Brazil
Matilde Breth‐Petersen relative to Kate Grailey United Kingdom Kate Grailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Kate Grailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matilde Breth‐Petersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matilde Breth‐Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matilde Breth‐Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matilde Breth‐Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matilde Breth‐Petersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matilde Breth‐Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matilde Breth‐Petersen. The network helps show where Matilde Breth‐Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matilde Breth‐Petersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matilde Breth‐Petersen Line = papers co-authored together Matilde Breth‐Petersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2022128
2 2021117
3 202232
4 202229
5 202319
6 202314
7 20239
8 20222
9 20211

About Matilde Breth‐Petersen

Matilde Breth‐Petersen is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, General Health Professions, Health, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change and Health Impacts (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (117 citations), General Health Professions (71 citations), Social Psychology (60 citations), Health (20 citations) and Clinical Psychology (51 citations). Matilde Breth‐Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Forbes McGain, Alexandra Barratt, Scott McAlister, David Story, Kate Charlesworth, Mao‐Sheng Ran, Brian J. Hall, Xuhong Li, Tianming Zhang and Tin Tin Su. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The Medical Journal of Australia, BMC Psychiatry, BMJ Open and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact