Mathilde Kazès

738 citations
21 papers · 474 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mathilde Kazès

21 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Mathilde Kazès
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 222
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 179
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Philosophy 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
Replace Mathieu Blanchard with:
Mathieu Blanchard Ireland
Lisa A. Bartolomeo United States
Marianna Frascarelli Italy
Jessica A. Wojtalik United States
Tania Pampoulova Canada
K Hiramatsu Japan
Skylar Kelsven United States
Kristen J. Prentice United States
Clifford Widmark United States
Thierry Rochet France
Mathilde Kazès relative to Mathieu Blanchard Ireland Mathieu Blanchard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mathieu Blanchard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathilde Kazès

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathilde Kazès's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathilde Kazès with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathilde Kazès more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathilde Kazès

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathilde Kazès. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathilde Kazès. The network helps show where Mathilde Kazès may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathilde Kazès, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathilde Kazès Line = papers co-authored together Mathilde Kazès links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199451
2 199946
3 199944
4 200343
5 201440
6 201038
7 199632
8 199828
9 201624
10 200923
11 199922
12 201316
13 199315
14 199713
15
Chronic persecutory delusion and autobiographical memories in patients with schizophrenia: a diary study.
201412
16 20188
17 20198
18 20067
19 20062
20 20231

About Mathilde Kazès

Mathilde Kazès is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Physiology and Philosophy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (222 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (179 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations). Mathilde Kazès has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Marie Danion, Dominique Willard, Marie‐Odile Krebs, Isabelle Amado, Philippe Robert, Caroline Huron, Pierre Vidailhet, Jean‐Pierre Olié, Yannick Morvan and Daniel Le Grange. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, L Encéphale, Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact