Mathilde Faideau

701 citations
11 papers · 578 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mathilde Faideau

10 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

Mathilde Faideau
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 321
  • Developmental Neuroscience 68
  • Neurology 128
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Neurology 86
Replace Carolina Montenegro‐Venegas with:
Carolina Montenegro‐Venegas Germany
Niamh C. O’Sullivan Ireland
Graciela Navarro Mora Italy
Theresa Bartels United Kingdom
Alexander F. Jeans United Kingdom
Jimena Monzón‐Sandoval United Kingdom
Lilian Enríquez-Barreto Spain
Alexandra von Faber-Castell Switzerland
Angelique di Domenico United States
Mahdokht Kohansal-Nodehi Germany
Mathilde Faideau relative to Carolina Montenegro‐Venegas Germany Carolina Montenegro‐Venegas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Carolina Montenegro‐Venegas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathilde Faideau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathilde Faideau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathilde Faideau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathilde Faideau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathilde Faideau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathilde Faideau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathilde Faideau. The network helps show where Mathilde Faideau may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathilde Faideau, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathilde Faideau Line = papers co-authored together Mathilde Faideau links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2010272
2 2008133
3 200938
4 201334
5 201425
6 201925
7 200922
8 201417
9 201210
10 20242
11 20260

About Mathilde Faideau

Mathilde Faideau is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Physiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (321 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (68 citations), Neurology (128 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations) and Neurology (86 citations). Mathilde Faideau has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gilles Bonvento, Philippe Hantraye, Nicole Déglon, Noëlle Dufour, Emmanuel Brouillet, Gwennaëlle Aurégan, Robert J. Ferrante, Martine Guillermier, Reid Gilmore and Jae-Hwan Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Glia, Brain, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact