Mathilde Bouvier
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure
- Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
Papers in
-
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 13
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 6
- Spectroscopy 12
- Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure 11
- Spectroscopy and Laser Applications 1
- Co-authors
- C. Ceccarelli (13 shared papers)A. López-Sepulcre (12 shared papers)Satoshi Yamamoto (9 shared papers)Nami Sakai (9 shared papers)C. Codella (8 shared papers)E. Bianchi (4 shared papers)Cécile Favre (4 shared papers)L. Podio (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Mathilde Bouvier
13 papers receiving 125 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 129
- Spectroscopy 93
- Atmospheric Science 59
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 27
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 2
Countries citing papers authored by Mathilde Bouvier
This map shows the geographic impact of Mathilde Bouvier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathilde Bouvier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathilde Bouvier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mathilde Bouvier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathilde Bouvier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathilde Bouvier. The network helps show where Mathilde Bouvier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathilde Bouvier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 |
About Mathilde Bouvier
Mathilde Bouvier is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy, Atmospheric Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Instrumentation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 147 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (13 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (11 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (1 paper), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1 paper) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (129 citations), Spectroscopy (93 citations), Atmospheric Science (59 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (27 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (2 citations). Mathilde Bouvier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include C. Ceccarelli, A. López-Sepulcre, Satoshi Yamamoto, Nami Sakai, C. Codella, E. Bianchi, Cécile Favre, L. Podio, Yao-Lun Yang and B. Leflóch. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal and Faraday Discussions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.