Mathieu Lavandier

50 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Mathieu Lavandier
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Speech and Hearing 510
  • Signal Processing 502
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 742
  • Sensory Systems 69
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
Replace Niek J. Versfeld with:
Niek J. Versfeld Netherlands
Sébastien Santurette Denmark
Anna Warzybok Germany
Clemen Boje Jensen Denmark
Bosun Xie China
Kazuhiro Iida Japan
Jan Rennies Germany
Koenraad S. Rhebergen Netherlands
Nandini Iyer United States
Tobias Goehring United Kingdom
Mathieu Lavandier relative to Niek J. Versfeld Netherlands Niek J. Versfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Niek J. Versfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu Lavandier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu Lavandier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu Lavandier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu Lavandier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu Lavandier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu Lavandier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu Lavandier. The network helps show where Mathieu Lavandier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu Lavandier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu Lavandier Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu Lavandier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010104
2 202069
3 201068
4 200862
5 201252
6 201336
7 201836
8 200731
9 201527
10 201923
11 201721
12 202121
13 202017
14 201617
15 202015
16 201515
17 202014
18 202012
19 201512
20 201612

About Mathieu Lavandier

Mathieu Lavandier is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Signal Processing, Biomedical Engineering and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (49 papers), Noise Effects and Management (41 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (33 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (8 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (4 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers) and Color perception and design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (510 citations), Signal Processing (502 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (742 citations), Sensory Systems (69 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations). Mathieu Lavandier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John F. Culling, Virginia Best, Sam Jelfs, Jörg M. Buchholz, Robert Baumgartner, Norbert Kopčo, Piotr Majdak, Nicolas Grimault, Mickael L. D. Deroche and Simon Makin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research, Acta acustica united with Acustica, Trends in Hearing and Applied Acoustics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact