Mathew Abrams

19 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

Mathew Abrams
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Developmental Neuroscience 45
  • Genetics 81
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 130
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 113
  • Biophysics 33
Replace Jane Roskams with:
Jane Roskams Canada
Kathryn McFadden United States
Jonghun Kim South Korea
Zixiang Luo China
Christina Kreutzer Austria
Marie‐Pierre Morel France
Daniel Hurley New Zealand
Jana Müller Germany
Sofie Goethals Belgium
Léorah Freeman United States
Mathew Abrams relative to Jane Roskams Canada Jane Roskams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jane Roskams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathew Abrams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathew Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathew Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathew Abrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathew Abrams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathew Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathew Abrams. The network helps show where Mathew Abrams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathew Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathew Abrams Line = papers co-authored together Mathew Abrams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009125
2 201767
3 201466
4 201250
5 201437
6 201325
7 201516
8 201516
9 200715
10 20158
11 20148
12 20167
13 20227
14 20147
15 20206
16 20192
17
Teaching Computation in Neuroscience: Notes on the 2019 Society for Neuroscience Professional Development Workshop on Teaching.
20212
18 20211
19 20211
20 20220

About Mathew Abrams

Mathew Abrams is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Information Systems and Management, Biophysics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (45 citations), Genetics (81 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (130 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (113 citations) and Biophysics (33 citations). Mathew Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jacob Kjell, Karin Pernold, Cecilia Dominguez, Zsuzsanna Wiesenfeld‐Hallin, Darwin J. Prockop, Roxanne L. Reger, Simone Codeluppi, Anna Josephson, Camilla I. Svensson and Ulf Eriksson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, PLoS ONE, Spinal Cord, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact