Mathew Abrams

18 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Mathew Abrams
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Developmental Neuroscience 48
  • Genetics 86
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 141
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 126
  • Biophysics 30
Replace Jane Roskams with:
Jane Roskams Canada
Kathryn McFadden United States
Christina Kreutzer Austria
Jonghun Kim South Korea
Zixiang Luo China
Lieven Huang United Kingdom
Teresa A. Evans United States
Marie‐Pierre Morel France
Elin Vinsland Sweden
Kent Imaizumi Japan
Mathew Abrams relative to Jane Roskams Canada Jane Roskams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jane Roskams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathew Abrams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathew Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathew Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathew Abrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathew Abrams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathew Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathew Abrams. The network helps show where Mathew Abrams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathew Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathew Abrams Line = papers co-authored together Mathew Abrams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009119
2 201763
3 201459
4 201246
5 201433
6 201322
7 201515
8 201515
9 200714
10 20227
11 20147
12 20156
13 20146
14 20206
15 20192
16
Teaching Computation in Neuroscience: Notes on the 2019 Society for Neuroscience Professional Development Workshop on Teaching.
20212
17 20211
18 20211
19 20190
20 20220

About Mathew Abrams

Mathew Abrams is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Biophysics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (9 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (3 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (48 citations), Genetics (86 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (141 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (126 citations) and Biophysics (30 citations). Mathew Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jacob Kjell, Zsuzsanna Wiesenfeld‐Hallin, Karin Pernold, Cecilia Dominguez, Darwin J. Prockop, Roxanne L. Reger, Simone Codeluppi, Camilla I. Svensson, Anna Josephson and Katalin Sándor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, Spinal Cord, PLoS ONE, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience and Genes Brain & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact