Math Janssen
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Papers in
-
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 5
- Child Therapy and Development 1
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 1
- Resilience and Mental Health 1
-
- Workplace Health and Well-being 2
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 1
- Co-authors
- Josephine Engels (5 shared papers)Béatrice van der Heijden (5 shared papers)Yvonne Heerkens (5 shared papers)Wietske Kuijer‐Siebelink (1 shared paper)Pascale Peters (4 shared papers)Hubert Korzilius (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Health Promotion International (1 paper)Mindfulness (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Math Janssen
5 papers receiving 270 citations
Math Janssen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Clinical Psychology 215
- Leadership and Management 6
- Applied Psychology 23
- General Health Professions 92
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Math Janssen
This map shows the geographic impact of Math Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Math Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Math Janssen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Math Janssen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Math Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Math Janssen. The network helps show where Math Janssen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Math Janssen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on employees’ mental health: A systematic review Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 251 |
| 2 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 |
About Math Janssen
Math Janssen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Information Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Child Therapy and Development (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Education and Learning Interventions (1 paper), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper) and Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (215 citations), Leadership and Management (6 citations), Applied Psychology (23 citations), General Health Professions (92 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). Math Janssen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Josephine Engels, Béatrice van der Heijden, Yvonne Heerkens, Wietske Kuijer‐Siebelink, Pascale Peters and Hubert Korzilius. Their work appears in journals such as Health Promotion International, Mindfulness, Trials, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.