Matar Seck
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Papers in
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 6
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 6
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 3
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 3
- Click Chemistry and Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Robert J. Bloch (4 shared papers)Bruno Figadère (9 shared papers)Reynald Hocquemiller (6 shared papers)Xavier Franck (6 shared papers)C. Perreau (2 shared papers)M.T. Hochereau-de Reviers (2 shared papers)Natacha Mérindol (6 shared papers)Isabel Desgagné‐Penix (6 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Matar Seck
48 papers receiving 481 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Organic Chemistry 240
- Pharmacology 67
- Reproductive Medicine 38
- Agronomy and Crop Science 48
- Biochemistry 24
Countries citing papers authored by Matar Seck
This map shows the geographic impact of Matar Seck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matar Seck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matar Seck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matar Seck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matar Seck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matar Seck. The network helps show where Matar Seck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matar Seck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 8 |
About Matar Seck
Matar Seck is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 54 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (6 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (5 papers), Moringa oleifera research and applications (4 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (240 citations), Pharmacology (67 citations), Reproductive Medicine (38 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (48 citations) and Biochemistry (24 citations). Matar Seck has collaborated with scholars based in France, Senegal and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Bloch, Bruno Figadère, Reynald Hocquemiller, Xavier Franck, C. Perreau, M.T. Hochereau-de Reviers, Natacha Mérindol, Isabel Desgagné‐Penix, Marco Masi and Antonio Evidente. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Tetrahedron, Medicinal Chemistry Research and Animal Reproduction Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.