Mary L. Wright

32 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Mary L. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 166
  • Aquatic Science 61
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 27
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 138
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 122
Replace Norifumi Konno with:
Norifumi Konno Japan
Dao H. Ho United States
Graham C. Boorse United States
Antonella Bona‐Gallo United States
L. Iela Italy
J. Boissin France
Camillo Vellano Italy
Cléo Alcantara Costa Leite Brazil
Itaru Hasunuma Japan
Renata C.H. Barros Brazil
Mary L. Wright relative to Norifumi Konno Japan Norifumi Konno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Norifumi Konno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary L. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary L. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary L. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary L. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary L. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary L. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary L. Wright. The network helps show where Mary L. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mary L. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary L. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Mary L. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199441
2 200338
3 200237
4 201136
5 201036
6 198835
7 199731
8 199629
9 200027
10 199924
11 197719
12 199017
13 198616
14 199115
15 198313
16 200613
17 200313
18 199513
19 198211
20 198111

About Mary L. Wright

Mary L. Wright is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 32 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physiological and biochemical adaptations (16 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (9 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (6 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers) and High Altitude and Hypoxia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (166 citations), Aquatic Science (61 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (27 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (138 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (122 citations). Mary L. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lori R. Kogan, Regina Schoenfeld‐Tacher, Kevin J. Greenlees, Mary Beth Clark, Adam Tucker, Maura J. Donohue, C. P. Baril, Alan Tucker, Travis M. Livieri and Amy King. Their work appears in journals such as General and Comparative Endocrinology, Journal of Experimental Zoology, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology, Development Growth & Differentiation and Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact