Mary Fox

91 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mary Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 79
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 177
  • Research and Theory 20
  • General Health Professions 378
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 69
Replace Janet C. Mentes with:
Janet C. Mentes United States
Victoria Traynor Australia
Tinne Dilles Belgium
Andrea Gilmore‐Bykovskyi United States
Ann L. Horgas United States
P. O. Sandman Sweden
Sarah Goldberg United Kingdom
Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani Japan
Corina Naughton Ireland
Kerstin Blomqvist Sweden
Mary Fox relative to Janet C. Mentes United States Janet C. Mentes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Janet C. Mentes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Fox. The network helps show where Mary Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Fox Line = papers co-authored together Mary Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012202
2 1997112
3 2013104
4 201396
5 200788
6 201384
7 200978
8 201060
9 202042
10 201935
11 201531
12 199230
13 201229
14 200529
15 201328
16 201727
17 201827
18 201627
19 201824
20 201922

About Mary Fox

Mary Fox is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (13 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (6 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (6 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (79 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (177 citations), Research and Theory (20 citations), General Health Professions (378 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (69 citations). Mary Fox has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Souraya Sidani, Dina Brooks, Deborah Tregunno, Malini Persaud, Kelly K. O’Brien, Dana R. Epstein, Véronique Boscart, Elizabeth Rochon, Riva Sorin‐Peters and Sherry Dahlke. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Nursing & Health, International Journal of Older People Nursing, Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact