MARY E. STEFL

21 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

MARY E. STEFL
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health Information Management 65
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Clinical Psychology 226
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Social Psychology 138
Replace Gillie Bolton with:
Gillie Bolton United Kingdom
Ruby A. Rouse United States
André Vyt Belgium
Desirée Kozlowski Australia
Joseph Doty United States
Linda Berg‐Cross United States
Doris Leung Hong Kong
Terrence G. Horgan United States
Gerry Farrell Australia
Nancy J. Karlin United States
MARY E. STEFL relative to Gillie Bolton United Kingdom Gillie Bolton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Gillie Bolton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by MARY E. STEFL

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of MARY E. STEFL's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MARY E. STEFL with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MARY E. STEFL more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by MARY E. STEFL

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by MARY E. STEFL. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MARY E. STEFL. The network helps show where MARY E. STEFL may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside MARY E. STEFL, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with MARY E. STEFL Line = papers co-authored together MARY E. STEFL links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008146
2 1985124
3 198462
4 199062
5 198520
6 201115
7 198915
8 198712
9 19729
10
Applying stakeholder analysis to health care administration education.
19949
11 20017
12 19846
13 19735
14 19953
15 19953
16 19843
17
The report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force: challenges and opportunities.
20042
18 20091
19 19741
20 19931

About MARY E. STEFL

MARY E. STEFL is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Organizational Change and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (65 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (226 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and Social Psychology (138 citations). MARY E. STEFL has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Bornstein, William N. Dember, Joseph E. Levinson, Edith S. Shear, Steven R. Howe, Gerald J. Bean, Mickey L. Parsons and Eileen Breslin. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers of Health Services Management, Community Mental Health Journal, Journal of Healthcare Management, INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing and Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact