Mary E. Randolph

14 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Mary E. Randolph
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Health 71
  • General Health Professions 162
  • Clinical Psychology 134
  • Reproductive Medicine 38
  • Gender Studies 45
Replace Colleen Keenan with:
Colleen Keenan United States
Penny S. Loosier United States
Rachel Logan United States
Lisa L. Lindley United States
Priscilla D. Abercrombie United States
Z. Helen Wu United States
Margaret Christine Snead United States
Barbara Gottlieb United States
Harry Jin United States
W D Mosher United States
Mary E. Randolph relative to Colleen Keenan United States Colleen Keenan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Colleen Keenan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Randolph

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Randolph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Randolph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Randolph more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Randolph

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Randolph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Randolph. The network helps show where Mary E. Randolph may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Randolph, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Randolph Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Randolph links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007140
2 200997
3 200952
4 200949
5 201448
6 201044
7 200927
8 200626
9 200625
10 200621
11 200619
12 200911
13 20113
14 20112

About Mary E. Randolph

Mary E. Randolph is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 14 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (71 citations), General Health Professions (162 citations), Clinical Psychology (134 citations), Reproductive Medicine (38 citations) and Gender Studies (45 citations). Mary E. Randolph has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include James L. Klosky, Heather L. Gamble, Steven D. Pinkerton, Heather Cecil, Paul R. Abramson, Laura M. Bogart, Diane M. Reddy, Gilbert R. Parra, Katie E. Mosack and Melissa M. Hudson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Sex Research, Health Psychology, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Journal of Pediatric Psychology and Community Mental Health Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact