Mary Bear
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Papers in
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 7
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 4
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 2
- Co-authors
- Debra L. Wagner (3 shared papers)Clint Bowers (1 shared paper)Pam Pieper (1 shared paper)Florian Jentsch (1 shared paper)Jeffrey W. Dwyer (1 shared paper)Molly C. Dougherty (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing (3 papers)Journal of Nursing Education (2 papers)Journal of Gerontological Social Work (2 papers)Public Health Nursing (2 papers)Journal of Applied Gerontology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mary Bear
20 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Research and Theory 29
- General Health Professions 269
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 35
- Leadership and Management 7
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Bear
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Bear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Bear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Bear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Bear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Bear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Bear. The network helps show where Mary Bear may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mary Bear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 41 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 1 |
About Mary Bear
Mary Bear is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Occupational Therapy, Rheumatology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (3 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (29 citations), General Health Professions (269 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (35 citations) and Leadership and Management (7 citations). Mary Bear has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Debra L. Wagner, Clint Bowers, Pam Pieper, Florian Jentsch, Jeffrey W. Dwyer and Molly C. Dougherty. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing, Journal of Nursing Education, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Public Health Nursing and Journal of Applied Gerontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.