Mary Acker

464 citations
21 papers · 345 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Acker

21 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Mary Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Internal Medicine 13
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 55
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 64
Replace June Crawford with:
June Crawford United States
Arthur Vogt Switzerland
Edward Seidl United States
Barbara A. Muller United States
Shawn M. Roberts United States
Vanessa Smith Belgium
David L. Blitz United States
Jeong‐Hyun Kim South Korea
Ana Torres Portugal
T. Ashikaga United States
Mary Acker relative to June Crawford United States June Crawford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
June Crawford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Acker. The network helps show where Mary Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mary Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Acker Line = papers co-authored together Mary Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198574
2 199037
3 198632
4 196130
5 196727
6 198922
7
Standardizing the prothrombin time. Calibrating coagulation instruments as well as thromboplastin.
199318
8 196417
9 196515
10 196312
11 199612
12 196610
13 19938
14 20206
15 19666
16 19615
17 19664
18 19664
19 19594
20 20171

About Mary Acker

Mary Acker is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological and Educational Research Studies (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations), Internal Medicine (13 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (55 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (64 citations). Mary Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul McReynolds, D. Nathan Cope, Conal B. Wilmot, Karyl M. Hall, Beverly Collins, John Eric Humphries, Paul Reynolds, Daniel M. Becker, D. L. Heene and Lindsay Bazydlo. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychology, Child Development, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Blood and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact