Martin Specht
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Nephrology top 10%
- Renal function and acid-base balance
Papers in
-
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment 4
-
- Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency 3
- Co-authors
- L. Hannemann (8 shared papers)Claudia Spies (7 shared papers)Donald L. Bredle (3 shared papers)Konrad Reinhart (3 shared papers)Andreas Meier‐Hellmann (4 shared papers)W. Schaffartzik (5 shared papers)Susanne Blum (3 shared papers)Hans Rommelspacher (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Critical Care Medicine (5 papers)Journal of Physiology-Paris (1 paper)American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Critical Care (1 paper)Journal of Biomedical Semantics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Martin Specht
17 papers receiving 518 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 88
- Nephrology 75
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 34
- Emergency Medicine 50
- Neurology 81
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Specht
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Specht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Specht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Specht. The network helps show where Martin Specht may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Martin Specht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 192 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 101 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 31 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 17 | Risk Identification Ontology (RIO): An ontology for specification and identification of perioperative risks. | 2016 | 1 |
About Martin Specht
Martin Specht is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Neurology, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (88 citations), Nephrology (75 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (34 citations), Emergency Medicine (50 citations) and Neurology (81 citations). Martin Specht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include L. Hannemann, Claudia Spies, Donald L. Bredle, Konrad Reinhart, Andreas Meier‐Hellmann, W. Schaffartzik, Susanne Blum, Hans Rommelspacher, Christian A. Mueller and H. W. Striebel. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Journal of Physiology-Paris, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Journal of Critical Care and Journal of Biomedical Semantics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.