M. Specht

27 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers

M. Specht
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 85
  • Neurology 203
  • Nephrology 87
  • Epidemiology 198
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 29
Replace Martin Specht with:
Martin Specht Germany
Duc Nam Nguyen Belgium
K. Shibutani United States
Bernardo Bollen Pinto Switzerland
Ricardo G. Cigarroa United States
Peter Fridrich Austria
Edward D. Sivak United States
Shlomoh Simchon United States
Alexandre Lima Netherlands
Robert Schlichtig United States
M. Specht relative to Martin Specht Germany Martin Specht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Martin Specht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Specht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Specht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Specht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Specht. The network helps show where M. Specht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Specht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Specht Line = papers co-authored together M. Specht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996127
2 1996104
3 200892
4 199785
5 199567
6 199666
7 200354
8 200136
9 199634
10 198821
11 199919
12 199611
13 199410
14 19918
15 19956
16 19966
17 19986
18 19935
19 19964
20 19944

About M. Specht

M. Specht is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Nephrology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (5 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (85 citations), Neurology (203 citations), Nephrology (87 citations), Epidemiology (198 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (29 citations). M. Specht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include L. Hannemann, Claudia Spies, Andreas Meier‐Hellmann, Konrad Reinhart, Donald L. Bredle, H. W. Striebel, Hans Rommelspacher, W. Schaffartzik, C. Müller and Tim Neumann. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive Care Medicine, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact