Martha E. Gaines

19 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

Martha E. Gaines
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • General Health Professions 236
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 42
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 168
  • Family Practice 10
Replace Stefanie Linklater with:
Stefanie Linklater Canada
Eddie Donaghy United Kingdom
Jennifer A. Palmer United States
James Merlino United States
Laura Shinkunas United States
Jane Desborough Australia
Claire Robinson United States
Jessica Ogarek United States
Kristofer L. Smith United States
Aziz Kamran Iran
Martha E. Gaines relative to Stefanie Linklater Canada Stefanie Linklater's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Stefanie Linklater · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Martha E. Gaines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martha E. Gaines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martha E. Gaines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martha E. Gaines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martha E. Gaines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martha E. Gaines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martha E. Gaines. The network helps show where Martha E. Gaines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Martha E. Gaines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Martha E. Gaines Line = papers co-authored together Martha E. Gaines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2017154
2 2015109
3 201567
4 201659
5 201551
6 201749
7 201437
8 201525
9 201424
10 201219
11 201618
12 201317
13 202017
14 201716
15 201215
16 201813
17 20196
18 20212
19
Alchemy: Medical Mediation at Its Best
20041

About Martha E. Gaines

Martha E. Gaines is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Oncology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Infection Control in Healthcare (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (236 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (42 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (168 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). Martha E. Gaines has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline M. Kruser, Karen J. Brasel, Margaret L. Schwarze, Nicole M. Steffens, Toby C. Campbell, Michael J. Nabozny, Beth A. Lown, Donald M. Berwick, David Hatem and Victor J. Dzau. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Academic Medicine, American Journal of Infection Control, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact