Marlies E. Oomen
Impact in
-
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- RNA Research and Splicing
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Biophysics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 6
-
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 6
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 3
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- RNA modifications and cancer 1
- Gene expression and cancer classification 1
- Co-authors
- Job Dekker (6 shared papers)Leonid A. Mirny (3 shared papers)Hugo B. Brandão (1 shared paper)Elizabeth H. Finn (1 shared paper)Anne-Laure Valton (1 shared paper)Gianluca Pegoraro (1 shared paper)Tom Misteli (1 shared paper)Hui Mao (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Methods (2 papers)Cell (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Chemistry (1 paper)Current Protocols in Protein Science (1 paper)Development (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Marlies E. Oomen
9 papers receiving 529 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Molecular Biology 461
- Biophysics 28
- Plant Science 156
- Structural Biology 4
- Genetics 59
Countries citing papers authored by Marlies E. Oomen
This map shows the geographic impact of Marlies E. Oomen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlies E. Oomen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlies E. Oomen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marlies E. Oomen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlies E. Oomen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlies E. Oomen. The network helps show where Marlies E. Oomen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marlies E. Oomen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 300 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 130 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 7 | Systematic evaluation of chromosome conformation capture assays | 2021 | 7 |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 |
About Marlies E. Oomen
Marlies E. Oomen is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Aging, Reproductive Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), RNA modifications and cancer (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (461 citations), Biophysics (28 citations), Plant Science (156 citations), Structural Biology (4 citations) and Genetics (59 citations). Marlies E. Oomen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Job Dekker, Leonid A. Mirny, Hugo B. Brandão, Elizabeth H. Finn, Anne-Laure Valton, Gianluca Pegoraro, Tom Misteli, Hui Mao, Hakan Özadam and Johan Harmen Gibcus. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Methods, Cell, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Current Protocols in Protein Science and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.