Markus Wirth

463 citations
23 papers · 371 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Markus Wirth

23 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Markus Wirth
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Human-Computer Interaction 203
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 95
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Replace Stefan Gradl with:
Stefan Gradl Germany
Robert Richer Germany
Germán Galvéz-García Chile
Kamilla Rún Jóhannsdóttir Iceland
Jack Brookes United Kingdom
Alireza Mazloumi Gavgani Australia
Oliver Baus Canada
Basel Kikhia Sweden
Sangwoo Cho South Korea
Maja Goršič United States
Markus Wirth relative to Stefan Gradl Germany Stefan Gradl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stefan Gradl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Wirth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Wirth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Wirth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Wirth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Wirth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Wirth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Wirth. The network helps show where Markus Wirth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Markus Wirth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Markus Wirth Line = papers co-authored together Markus Wirth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201667
2 201646
3 201840
4 201932
5 201919
6 202118
7 201916
8 201816
9 201516
10 202214
11 201814
12 201712
13 201610
14 202110
15 20198
16 20188
17 20166
18 20205
19 20214
20 20184

About Markus Wirth

Markus Wirth is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Social Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (7 papers), Sports Performance and Training (4 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (2 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (203 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (95 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). Markus Wirth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bjoern M. Eskofier, Stefan Gradl, Eduardo Velloso, Hans W. Gellersen, Christian Weichel, Augusto Esteves, Nicolas Rohleder, Robert Richer, Daniel Roth and Bo Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Sensors, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact