Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

2.2k citations
302 papers · · active since 2018

Impact in

Papers in

Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

242 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 918
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.2k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 262
  • Computational Mechanics 812
  • Control and Systems Engineering 369
Replace APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing with:
APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing Japan
Computational Visual Media China
Visual Informatics China
3D Research China
Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware China
Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences South Korea
Real-Time Imaging United States
Image Processing On Line France
IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games United States
International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval China
Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques relative to APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing Japan APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.

About Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

The 302 papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques usually cover Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (150 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (166 papers), Human-Computer Interaction (39 papers), Computational Mechanics (103 papers) and Architecture (5 papers) specifically the topics of Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (142 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (88 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (85 papers), Human Motion and Animation (42 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (29 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (24 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (22 papers) and Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques are Bernhard Kerbl, Cem Yuksel, Christoph Peters, Carsten Dachsbacher, Tomas Akenine‐Möller, Pontus Andersson, Magnus Oskarsson, Mark D. Fairchild, George Drettakis and Kalle Åström.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact