Marko Terviö

2.0k citations
23 papers · 969 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Marko Terviö

23 papers receiving 894 citations

Peers

Marko Terviö
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Accounting 396
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 185
  • Economics and Econometrics 570
  • Finance 159
  • Strategy and Management 149
Replace Friedrich Heinemann with:
Friedrich Heinemann Germany
Tim Worrall United Kingdom
Annette Alstadsæter Norway
M. Todd Henderson United States
Mitu Gulati United States
Caroline Van Rijckeghem Switzerland
Davide Ticchi Italy
Henry W. Chappell United States
Moshe Justman Israel
Christian Fons‐Rosen United States
Marko Terviö relative to Friedrich Heinemann Germany Friedrich Heinemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Friedrich Heinemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marko Terviö

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marko Terviö's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marko Terviö with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marko Terviö more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marko Terviö

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marko Terviö. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marko Terviö. The network helps show where Marko Terviö may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Marko Terviö, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marko Terviö Line = papers co-authored together Marko Terviö links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008372
2 2002197
3 200993
4 200765
5 201448
6 201740
7 201324
8 201422
9 200622
10 201019
11
The long-term impact of colonial rule: evidence from India
200419
12 200611
13 20136
14 20216
15 20145
16 20085
17 20164
18 20213
19 20242
20 20092

About Marko Terviö

Marko Terviö is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting, Marketing and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 23 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (5 papers), Economic theories and models (4 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Game Theory and Applications (2 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (396 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (185 citations), Economics and Econometrics (570 citations), Finance (159 citations) and Strategy and Management (149 citations). Marko Terviö has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Douglas A. Irwin, Ernesto Dal Bó, Ali Sina Önder, Tuomas Pekkarinen, Matti Sarvimäki, Roope Uusitalo, Markus Jokela, Pauli Murto, Kaisa Kotakorpi and Lakshmi Iyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the European Economic Association, The Review of Economic Studies, International Economic Review, Journal of International Economics and American Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact