Mark Winer

1.2k citations
14 papers · 865 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Winer

13 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers

Mark Winer
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • General Decision Sciences 63
  • Safety Research 153
  • Economics and Econometrics 385
  • Management Science and Operations Research 123
  • Political Science and International Relations 228
Replace Michael Taylor with:
Michael Taylor United Kingdom
Stephen A. LaTour United States
David Butler Australia
Jenna Bednar United States
Jo Groebel Germany
Lars Udéhn Sweden
Randy T. Simmons United States
Russell Korobkin United States
Mathias Risse United States
Santiago Sánchez‐Pagés United Kingdom
Mark Winer relative to Michael Taylor United Kingdom Michael Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Michael Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Winer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Winer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Winer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Winer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Winer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Winer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Winer. The network helps show where Mark Winer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark Winer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Winer Line = papers co-authored together Mark Winer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1983280
2 1978118
3 198394
4 198181
5 198378
6 198357
7 198355
8 197647
9 198322
10 198018
11 197911
12 19802
13
Por qué crece el sector público
19861
14 19881

About Mark Winer

Mark Winer is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper), Social Sciences and Policies (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (63 citations), Safety Research (153 citations), Economics and Econometrics (385 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (123 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (228 citations). Mark Winer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Howard Margolis, Peter C. Ordeshook, Richard D. McKelvey, J Comer, Susan Welch, Christopher H. Achen, Patrick D. Larkey, Chandler Stolp, Robert D. Behn and James W. Vaupel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Social Science Computer Review and Systems Research and Behavioral Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact