Mark W. Schulz

559 citations
11 papers · 521 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 1
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 1
    • Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research 4

Mark W. Schulz

11 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers

Mark W. Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Ophthalmology 137
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 128
  • Cell Biology 87
  • Molecular Biology 260
  • Genetics 103
Replace T.J.R. van de Pol with:
T.J.R. van de Pol Netherlands
Norm L. Hawes United States
Anita Blankenagel Germany
Ohad Shaham Israel
Yelena Kleyner United States
Dominique Larget‐Piet France
Jillian N. Pearring United States
Richard Eva United Kingdom
Maria-Thereza R. Perez Sweden
Sanae Sakami United States
Mark W. Schulz relative to T.J.R. van de Pol Netherlands T.J.R. van de Pol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
T.J.R. van de Pol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark W. Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. Schulz. The network helps show where Mark W. Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark W. Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark W. Schulz Line = papers co-authored together Mark W. Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1993152
2 199075
3
Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta-induced cataractous changes in lens explants by ocular media and alpha 2-macroglobulin.
199655
4 199546
5 199739
6 199532
7 199530
8 199426
9 199526
10 199322
11 199418

About Mark W. Schulz

Mark W. Schulz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), TGF-β signaling in diseases (1 paper), Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (1 paper) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (137 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (128 citations), Cell Biology (87 citations), Molecular Biology (260 citations) and Genetics (103 citations). Mark W. Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Coral G. Chamberlain, Max R. Bennett, John W. McAvoy, Robb U. de Iongh, Krystel R. Huxlin, T.R. Raju, Kerry A. Nichol, Gregory B. Ralston, J.W. McAvoy and Ann Jervie Sefton. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Brain Research, Brain Research, Development, Growth Factors and Journal of Neurochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact