Mark van Hoeij

62 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark van Hoeij
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Algebra and Number Theory 255
  • Geometry and Topology 407
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 732
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 110
  • Computational Mathematics 14
Replace Nobuki Takayama with:
Nobuki Takayama Japan
Guillaume Hanrot France
Manuel Bronstein France
Hans Schönemann Germany
Raphael Loewy Israel
Barry Trager United States
С. А. Абрамов Russia
Maurice Mignotte France
Rick Miranda United States
Robert Grone United States
Mark van Hoeij relative to Nobuki Takayama Japan Nobuki Takayama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Nobuki Takayama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark van Hoeij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark van Hoeij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark van Hoeij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark van Hoeij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark van Hoeij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark van Hoeij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark van Hoeij. The network helps show where Mark van Hoeij may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark van Hoeij, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark van Hoeij Line = papers co-authored together Mark van Hoeij links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201877
2 199775
3 199974
4 199763
5 200259
6 200157
7 200355
8 199851
9 200249
10 199441
11 200139
12 199738
13 199932
14 199728
15 199524
16 199924
17 200923
18 201623
19 200222
20 199621

About Mark van Hoeij

Mark van Hoeij is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence and Numerical Analysis, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polynomial and algebraic computation (38 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (10 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (10 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (9 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (8 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (8 papers) and graph theory and CDMA systems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (255 citations), Geometry and Topology (407 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (732 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (110 citations) and Computational Mathematics (14 citations). Mark van Hoeij has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Deconinck, С. А. Абрамов, Jacques-Arthur Weil, Thomas Cluzeau, Michael Monagan, Carsten Schneider, Matthias Heil, Alexander I. Bobenko, Clemens G. Raab and Jakob Ablinger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Journal of Number Theory, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Journal of Symbolic Computation and Algorithmica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact