Anna Banik

38 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers

Anna Banik
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Applied Psychology 119
  • Biological Psychiatry 37
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • Social Psychology 155
  • Health 53
Replace Ben Beaglehole with:
Ben Beaglehole New Zealand
Karin Waldherr Austria
Vincenzo Giallonardo Italy
Xinfeng Tang China
Hendrik Berth Germany
Raheel Mushtaq India
Shirley Brown United States
Julian Beezhold United Kingdom
Kia Gluschkoff Finland
András Székely Hungary
Anna Banik relative to Ben Beaglehole New Zealand Ben Beaglehole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Ben Beaglehole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Banik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Banik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Banik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Banik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Banik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Banik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Banik. The network helps show where Anna Banik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Banik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Banik Line = papers co-authored together Anna Banik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017237
2 202076
3 201862
4 201958
5 202051
6 201644
7 202030
8 201626
9 202224
10 202115
11 202214
12 202111
13 201910
14 202110
15 202310
16 20249
17 20239
18 20238
19 20228
20 20178

About Anna Banik

Anna Banik is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 783 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (119 citations), Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Social Psychology (155 citations) and Health (53 citations). Anna Banik has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Aleksandra Łuszczyńska, Katarzyna Czekierda, Crystal L. Park, Nina Knoll, Bartłomiej Stańczykiewicz, Urte Scholz, Ralf Schwarzer, Jan Keller, Monika Boberska and Błażej Misiak. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Behavioral Medicine, BMC Public Health, Obesity Reviews, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact