Mark Tushnet

520 citations
6 papers · 156 · h-index 2

Impact in

  • Law top 1%
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
    • Comparative and International Law Studies
    • Brazilian Legal Issues
    • Legal processes and jurisprudence
    • European and International Law Studies
    • Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
    • International Law and Human Rights

Papers in

  • Law 4
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies 4
    • European and International Law Studies 2
    • International Law and Aviation 1
    • Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 1
    • American Constitutional Law and Politics 1
Journals
The Yale Law Journal (1 paper)Michigan Law Review (1 paper)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)Osgoode Hall law journal (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Mark Tushnet

4 papers receiving 103 citations

Peers

Mark Tushnet
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Law 110
  • Political Science and International Relations 111
  • Strategy and Management 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 29
  • Public Administration 2
Replace Christine Landfried with:
Christine Landfried Germany
Roger Masterman United Kingdom
Anneli Albi United Kingdom
Mark Elliott United Kingdom
Jacco Bomhoff United Kingdom
Mauro Bussani Italy
Zdeněk Kühn Czechia
Aida Torres Pérez Spain
Arthur S. Hartkamp Netherlands
Julio Baquero Cruz Belgium
Mark Tushnet relative to Christine Landfried Germany Christine Landfried's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Christine Landfried · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tushnet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tushnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tushnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tushnet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tushnet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tushnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tushnet. The network helps show where Mark Tushnet may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1999104
2 200349
3 20182
4 20131
5 20200
6 20060

About Mark Tushnet

Mark Tushnet is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Insect Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), European and International Law Studies (2 papers), International Law and Aviation (1 paper), Legal and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper) and International Arbitration and Investment Law (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (110 citations), Political Science and International Relations (111 citations), Strategy and Management (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (29 citations) and Public Administration (2 citations). Mark Tushnet has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as The Yale Law Journal, Michigan Law Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Osgoode Hall law journal and Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact