Mark Tiede

155 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Mark Tiede
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.7k
  • Linguistics and Language 391
  • Signal Processing 511
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 863
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 538
Replace Melanie L. Matthies with:
Melanie L. Matthies United States
Diane Kewley-Port United States
Andrew J. Lotto United States
Anders Löfqvist United States
Harvey M. Sussman United States
D. H. Whalen United States
Sven L. Mattys United Kingdom
Betty Tuller United States
Alexander L. Francis United States
Valérie Hazan United Kingdom
Mark Tiede relative to Melanie L. Matthies United States Melanie L. Matthies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Melanie L. Matthies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tiede

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tiede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tiede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tiede more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tiede

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tiede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tiede. The network helps show where Mark Tiede may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tiede, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Tiede Line = papers co-authored together Mark Tiede links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 165 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009134
2 2004127
3 2008121
4 2012117
5 200489
6 200575
7 199975
8 200461
9 201058
10 199656
11 201753
12 201439
13 202135
14 201635
15 201733
16 201732
17 201832
18 201531
19 201731
20 200730

About Mark Tiede

Mark Tiede is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 165 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (127 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (54 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (45 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (21 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (20 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (19 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (18 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.7k citations), Linguistics and Language (391 citations), Signal Processing (511 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (863 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (538 citations). Mark Tiede has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Joseph S. Perkell, D. H. Whalen, Frank H. Guenther, Melanie L. Matthies, Suzanne Boyce, Carol Espy-Wilson, David J. Ostry, Harlan Lane, Takayuki Ito and Majid Zandipour. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Journal of Phonetics, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact