Mark Tiede

3.4k citations
136 papers · 2.4k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Tiede

128 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Mark Tiede
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.6k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 335
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 424
  • Physiology 354
  • Signal Processing 75
Replace Melanie L. Matthies with:
Melanie L. Matthies United States
Anders Löfqvist Sweden
Betty Tuller United States
Dani Byrd United States
Joseph S. Perkell United States
William J. Hardcastle United Kingdom
Lucie Ménard Canada
Osamu Fujimura United States
Eric Vatikiotis‐Bateson Canada
Andrew J. Lotto United States
Mark Tiede relative to Melanie L. Matthies United States Melanie L. Matthies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Melanie L. Matthies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tiede

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tiede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tiede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tiede more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tiede

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tiede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tiede. The network helps show where Mark Tiede may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tiede, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Tiede Line = papers co-authored together Mark Tiede links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009156
2 2004135
3 2008130
4 2012123
5 200495
6 199680
7 200579
8 199970
9 201063
10 200462
11 201762
12 202144
13 201441
14 201737
15 201737
16 201636
17 201836
18 200733
19 201732
20 201531

About Mark Tiede

Mark Tiede is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physiology and Signal Processing, having authored 136 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (112 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (16 papers), Language Development and Disorders (11 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.6k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (335 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (424 citations), Physiology (354 citations) and Signal Processing (75 citations). Mark Tiede has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph S. Perkell, Frank H H Guenther, D. H. Whalen, Suzanne Boyce, David J. Ostry, Melanie L. Matthies, Carol Espy-Wilson, Harlan L. Lane, Takayuki Ito and Majid Zandipour. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Journal of Phonetics, PLoS ONE and Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact