Mark T. Morman

22 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

Mark T. Morman
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Social Psychology 438
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Demography 172
  • Applied Psychology 59
  • Gender Studies 102
Replace Sarah Badger with:
Sarah Badger United States
Colin Hesse United States
Sally L. Archer United States
Linda A. Kraus United States
A. L. Greene United States
Clare M. Mehta United States
Semira Tagliabue Italy
Jerry J. Bigner United States
Barry Spinner Canada
Chiachih D. C. Wang United States
Mark T. Morman relative to Sarah Badger United States Sarah Badger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Sarah Badger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Morman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Morman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Morman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Morman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Morman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Morman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Morman. The network helps show where Mark T. Morman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mark T. Morman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark T. Morman Line = papers co-authored together Mark T. Morman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998161
2 200087
3 200087
4 200671
5 199760
6 200256
7 200638
8 200337
9 199831
10 199929
11 200129
12 201922
13 200519
14 201418
15 200016
16 201116
17 201214
18 201210
19 20218
20
Perceived Benefits of the Friends with Benefits Relationship
20093

About Mark T. Morman

Mark T. Morman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, Demography and General Health Professions, having authored 22 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (12 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (438 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Demography (172 citations), Applied Psychology (59 citations) and Gender Studies (102 citations). Mark T. Morman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Kory Floyd, Paul Schrodt, Perry M. Pauley, Katie Green and Elizabeth Holmes. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Quarterly, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Western Journal of Communication, The Journal of Social Psychology and Communication Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact