Mark Strohmeier

23 papers receiving 943 citations

Peers

Mark Strohmeier
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Spectroscopy 397
  • Pharmaceutical Science 165
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 194
  • Materials Chemistry 200
  • Inorganic Chemistry 63
Replace Leonard J. Chyall with:
Leonard J. Chyall United States
Clelia W. Mallory United States
Sonia Elizabeth Ulic Argentina
Mária Ács Hungary
Hans Georg Mack Germany
Jolanta Natalia Latosińska Poland
Yury V. Vishnevskiy Germany
Asok Kumar Mukherjee India
Stephen J. Heyes United Kingdom
Šimon Budzák Slovakia
Mark Strohmeier relative to Leonard J. Chyall United States Leonard J. Chyall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Leonard J. Chyall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Strohmeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Strohmeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Strohmeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Strohmeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Strohmeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Strohmeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Strohmeier. The network helps show where Mark Strohmeier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Strohmeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Strohmeier Line = papers co-authored together Mark Strohmeier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008170
2 2010160
3 1997101
4 200357
5 200751
6 201143
7 200642
8 201242
9 200437
10 201235
11 201434
12 199733
13 200933
14 200125
15 200220
16 201318
17 200416
18 200716
19 201013
20 200212

About Mark Strohmeier

Mark Strohmeier is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Pharmaceutical Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 24 papers that have together received 983 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (2 papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (2 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (397 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (165 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (194 citations), Materials Chemistry (200 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (63 citations). Mark Strohmeier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David M. Grant, Frederick G. Vogt, Jacalyn S. Clawson, Tran Nghia Pham, Ronald J. Pugmire, Dirk Stueber, Mark S. Solum, Julio Cesar Facelli, Anita M. Orendt and Matthew A. Zajac. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Molecular Pharmaceutics, Journal of Magnetic Resonance and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact