Mark Springett

33 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Mark Springett
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Human-Computer Interaction 115
  • Information Systems and Management 39
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 13
  • Food Science 95
  • Biochemistry 21
Replace Gerhard Leitner with:
Gerhard Leitner Austria
Chris Powell United Kingdom
Erik Geelhoed United Kingdom
Giani Petri Brazil
Dong-Seong Choi South Korea
Nawaz Khan United Kingdom
Bowen Hui Canada
Bo-Kyeong Kim South Korea
Johnson United States
Sanghyun Park South Korea
Mark Springett relative to Gerhard Leitner Austria Gerhard Leitner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Gerhard Leitner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Springett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Springett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Springett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Springett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Springett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Springett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Springett. The network helps show where Mark Springett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Springett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Springett Line = papers co-authored together Mark Springett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199776
2 200662
3 200538
4 200030
5 198923
6 201422
7 200618
8 199917
9 201716
10 200714
11 201713
12 200711
13 198911
14 199410
15 20198
16 20058
17 20117
18
From user's problems to design errors: linking evaluation to improving design practice
19937
19 20246
20 20096

About Mark Springett

Mark Springett is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Food Science, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Occupational Therapy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (115 citations), Information Systems and Management (39 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (13 citations), Food Science (95 citations) and Biochemistry (21 citations). Mark Springett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, North Macedonia and France. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Sutcliffe, Andrée Voilley, Jean‐Luc Le Quéré, Alice B. Nongonierma, J.B. Adams, Martin Mihajlov, Philippe Cayot, Michele B. Ryan, Juan Carlos Augusto and Effie Law. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, Behaviour and Information Technology, Food Hydrocolloids, International Dairy Journal and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact