Mark Springett

46 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Mark Springett
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Human-Computer Interaction 144
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 18
  • Information Systems and Management 50
  • Food Science 122
  • Biochemistry 23
Replace Chris Powell with:
Chris Powell United Kingdom
Hsinyi Peng Taiwan
Anand Kulkarni United States
Nawaz Khan United Kingdom
Laura Tarantino Italy
Bowen Hui Canada
Abbe Don United States
Bo-Kyeong Kim South Korea
Dong-Seong Choi South Korea
Janet Ward United Kingdom
Mark Springett relative to Chris Powell United Kingdom Chris Powell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Chris Powell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Springett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Springett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Springett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Springett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Springett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Springett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Springett. The network helps show where Mark Springett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Springett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Springett Line = papers co-authored together Mark Springett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199787
2 200671
3 200547
4 200040
5 198925
6 201422
7 199921
8 200619
9 201719
10 200715
11 200714
12 201714
13 199413
14 198912
15 201212
16 200510
17
From user's problems to design errors: linking evaluation to improving design practice
19939
18 19968
19 20118
20 20198

About Mark Springett

Mark Springett is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Food Science, Demography and Occupational Therapy, having authored 48 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (6 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (6 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (6 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (6 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (4 papers) and Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (144 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (18 citations), Information Systems and Management (50 citations), Food Science (122 citations) and Biochemistry (23 citations). Mark Springett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and North Macedonia. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Sutcliffe, Andrée Voilley, Alice B. Nongonierma, Jean‐Luc Le Quéré, J.B. Adams, Philippe Cayot, Martin Mihajlov, Michele B. Ryan, Juan Carlos Augusto and Tim French. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, International Dairy Journal, Behaviour and Information Technology, Food Hydrocolloids and Food Reviews International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact