Mark Sherriff

1.0k citations
44 papers · 733 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Software Engineering Research 16
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 8
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 12
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 6

Mark Sherriff

43 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers

Mark Sherriff
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Orthodontics 243
  • General Dentistry 71
  • Software 134
  • Oral Surgery 206
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 35
Replace Lena Karlsson with:
Lena Karlsson Sweden
Francesco Maiorana Italy
Marc Hesenius Germany
Martin Strunga Slovakia
Ali Mohammad Saghiri Iran
Jana Surovková Slovakia
Young Ho Kim South Korea
Ole Meyer Germany
J. González Spain
Phattanapon Rhienmora Thailand
Mark Sherriff relative to Lena Karlsson Sweden Lena Karlsson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Lena Karlsson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sherriff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sherriff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sherriff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sherriff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sherriff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sherriff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sherriff. The network helps show where Mark Sherriff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Sherriff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Sherriff Line = papers co-authored together Mark Sherriff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011101
2 201277
3 201271
4 201262
5 200956
6 200747
7 201040
8 200837
9 201031
10 201423
11 201621
12 202119
13 201316
14 200514
15 200811
16 201011
17 20149
18 20128
19 20117
20 20187

About Mark Sherriff

Mark Sherriff is a scholar working on Information Systems, Software, Computer Science Applications, Orthodontics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 44 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (16 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (12 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (8 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (8 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (6 papers), Dental materials and restorations (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (243 citations), General Dentistry (71 citations), Software (134 citations), Oral Surgery (206 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (35 citations). Mark Sherriff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Laurie Williams, P. A. Reynolds, Mary E. Cooke, Sarah Heckman, Ahmed Almahdy, Avijit Banerjee, Salvatore Sauro, T F Watson, Federico Foschi and Francesco Mannocci. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Orthodontics, Caries Research, European Journal Of Dental Education, Journal of Dental Research and International Endodontic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact