Mark Schmitt

94 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Mark Schmitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 497
  • Cancer Research 276
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 450
  • Immunology 275
  • Geophysics 173
Replace M. Sasaki with:
M. Sasaki Japan
Cha‐Mei Tang United States
Henry Brysk United States
Matthew R. Edwards United States
Csilla I. Szabo United States
Tatsufumi Nakamura Japan
Liron Levin Israel
Sakae Saito Japan
Hiroshi Itô Japan
I Földeş Hungary
Mark Schmitt relative to M. Sasaki Japan M. Sasaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
M. Sasaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schmitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schmitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schmitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schmitt. The network helps show where Mark Schmitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Schmitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Schmitt Line = papers co-authored together Mark Schmitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994191
2 1993147
3 1999115
4 1994114
5 2009102
6 200854
7 198638
8 201134
9 201633
10 201029
11 200028
12 198728
13
The bZIP domains of Fos and Jun mediate a physical association with the TATA box-binding protein.
199328
14 201626
15 201425
16 201224
17 199224
18 200022
19 199319
20 200818

About Mark Schmitt

Mark Schmitt is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (41 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (27 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (26 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (22 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (20 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (15 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (14 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (497 citations), Cancer Research (276 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (450 citations), Immunology (275 citations) and Geophysics (173 citations). Mark Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Inder M. Verma, Shigeki Miyamoto, M. Maki, Masashi Hatanaka, Nikunj V. Somia, Lawrence D. Kerr, P Wamsley, Lynn J. Ransone, Kirk Flippo and B. J. Albright. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Review of Scientific Instruments and IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact