Mark S. Reed
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.1%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Forest Management and Policy
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 0.02%
- Coastal and Marine Management
Papers in
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 41
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance 26
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 26
- Forest Management and Policy 17
-
- Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology 18
- Co-authors
- Lindsay C. Stringer (30 shared papers)Andrew J. Dougill (20 shared papers)Christina Prell (15 shared papers)Klaus Hubacek (25 shared papers)Evan Fraser (11 shared papers)Anna C. Evely (8 shared papers)Claire H. Quinn (9 shared papers)Ioan Fazey (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ecosystem Services (11 papers)Journal of Environmental Management (10 papers)Land Degradation and Development (7 papers)Ecology and Society (6 papers)Environmental Science & Policy (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark S. Reed
189 papers receiving 18.1k citations
Mark S. Reed's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
- Global and Planetary Change 8.5k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 4.3k
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.9k
- Ecological Modeling 526
- Ecology 3.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Reed. The network helps show where Mark S. Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark S. Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 194 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 3147 |
| 2 | Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 1951 |
| 3 | What is Social Learning? Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 1181 |
| 4 | Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 861 |
| 5 | Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 824 |
| 6 | Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 778 |
| 7 | An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 610 |
| 8 | Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 511 |
| 9 | A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 465 |
| 10 | Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 322 |
| 11 | The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 320 |
| 12 | 2009 | 276 | |
| 13 | How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 258 |
| 14 | 2014 | 250 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 236 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 223 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 214 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 214 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 195 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 184 |
About Mark S. Reed
Mark S. Reed is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 194 papers that have together received 19.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (41 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (26 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (26 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (22 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (19 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (18 papers), Forest Management and Policy (17 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (8.5k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (4.3k citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (1.9k citations), Ecological Modeling (526 citations) and Ecology (3.0k citations). Mark S. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lindsay C. Stringer, Andrew J. Dougill, Christina Prell, Klaus Hubacek, Evan Fraser, Anna C. Evely, Claire H. Quinn, Ioan Fazey, Joe Morris and Norman Dandy. Their work appears in journals such as Ecosystem Services, Journal of Environmental Management, Land Degradation and Development, Ecology and Society and Environmental Science & Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.