Jonathan Sadowsky

18 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Jonathan Sadowsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Clinical Psychology 197
  • General Psychology 12
  • History 88
  • Philosophy 73
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 70
Replace Ben Shephard with:
Ben Shephard
Ian Dowbiggin Canada
Paul Lerner United States
Edwin R. Wallace United States
Sally Swartz South Africa
Andrew Treacher Hong Kong
Rhodri Hayward United Kingdom
John C. Spurlock United States
Junko Kitanaka Japan
Steven J. Hirsch United States
Jonathan Sadowsky relative to Ben Shephard Ben Shephard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ben Shephard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Sadowsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Sadowsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Sadowsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Sadowsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Sadowsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Sadowsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Sadowsky. The network helps show where Jonathan Sadowsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Sadowsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Sadowsky Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Sadowsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003121
2 199975
3
Imperial bedlam: institutions of madness in colonial southwest Nigeria.
199967
4 200530
5 200017
6
Electroconvulsive Therapy in America: The Anatomy of a Medical Controversy
201615
7 201612
8 19948
9 19977
10 20107
11 20215
12 20033
13 20192
14 20182
15 20032
16 20032
17 19961
18 19991
19 20171
20 19991

About Jonathan Sadowsky

Jonathan Sadowsky is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, History, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (8 papers), History of Science and Medicine (5 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (197 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), History (88 citations), Philosophy (73 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (70 citations). Jonathan Sadowsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James M. Wilce, Esperanza Díaz, Misty L. Bastian, Janis H. Jenkins, Sue E. Estroff, Ann M. Kring, Arthur Kleinman, Ellen Corin, Byron J. Good and Robert J. Barrett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Bulletin of the history of medicine, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and African Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact