Mark Pines
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 1%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Hepatology top 2%
- Liver physiology and pathology
Papers in
-
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 20
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 8
-
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 15
- Co-authors
- Arnon Nagler (32 shared papers)Shmuel Hurwitz (37 shared papers)Olga Genina (26 shared papers)Orna Halevy (24 shared papers)Olga Genin (22 shared papers)Peter Gierschik (7 shared papers)Viktor Knopov (8 shared papers)Itai Spector (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Poultry Science (13 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (7 papers)General and Comparative Endocrinology (7 papers)Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology (6 papers)Endocrinology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Mark Pines
182 papers receiving 7.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Animal Science and Zoology 598
- Hepatology 408
- Molecular Biology 3.2k
- Immunology 741
- Immunology and Allergy 198
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pines
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pines more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pines
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pines. The network helps show where Mark Pines may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 183 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 220 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 193 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 151 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 145 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 137 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 136 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 135 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 129 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 118 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 116 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 115 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 109 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 108 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 105 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 102 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 98 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 93 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 92 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 89 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 86 |
About Mark Pines
Mark Pines is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Rheumatology and Oncology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 7.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (20 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (15 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (13 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (11 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (10 papers), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (10 papers), Bone health and treatments (9 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (598 citations), Hepatology (408 citations), Molecular Biology (3.2k citations), Immunology (741 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (198 citations). Mark Pines has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Arnon Nagler, Shmuel Hurwitz, Olga Genina, Orna Halevy, Olga Genin, Peter Gierschik, Viktor Knopov, Itai Spector, Allen M. Spiegel and Irena Lavelin. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, General and Comparative Endocrinology, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology and Endocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.