Mark Pines

179 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Mark Pines
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Animal Science and Zoology 550
  • Hepatology 361
  • Molecular Biology 3.0k
  • Immunology 681
  • Immunology and Allergy 188
Replace Le Shen with:
Le Shen United States
Mamoru Hasegawa Japan
Hua Zhu United States
Patricia S. Thomas United States
Rajendra Raghow United States
Takashi Shimada Japan
Sakari Kauppinen Denmark
Norimasa Sawada Japan
Maria Rosaria Torrisi Italy
G H Wong United States
Mark Pines relative to Le Shen United States Le Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Le Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pines. The network helps show where Mark Pines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pines Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 180 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002210
2 1999182
3 2003139
4 1986135
5 1998126
6 1986125
7 2001122
8 2007116
9 1986115
10 2008111
11 2015105
12 1995102
13 1993100
14 199799
15 201196
16 201494
17 200089
18 198585
19 199682
20
Inhibition of bladder carcinoma angiogenesis, stromal support, and tumor growth by halofuginone.
199981

About Mark Pines

Mark Pines is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 180 papers that have together received 7.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (20 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (15 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (13 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (10 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (10 papers), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (10 papers), Bone health and treatments (9 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (550 citations), Hepatology (361 citations), Molecular Biology (3.0k citations), Immunology (681 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (188 citations). Mark Pines has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Arnon Nagler, S. Hurwitz, Olga Genina, Orna Halevy, Olga Genin, Peter Gierschik, V. Knopov, Itai Spector, Allen M. Spiegel and Efrat Monsonego‐Ornan. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, General and Comparative Endocrinology, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact