Mark Piehl

481 citations
21 papers · 342 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Piehl

20 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Mark Piehl
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 47
  • Emergency Medicine 74
  • Pharmacy 19
  • General Health Professions 56
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 47
Replace Julije Meštrović with:
Julije Meštrović Croatia
Anne Lyren United States
Sandra Williams United States
April Kam Canada
Lindsey K. Grossman United States
Susanne Jöbges Germany
Kathrin Knochel Germany
Adrian Plunkett United Kingdom
Lisa Nathan United States
Stephen D. Emond United States
Mark Piehl relative to Julije Meštrović Croatia Julije Meštrović's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Julije Meštrović · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Piehl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Piehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Piehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Piehl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Piehl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Piehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Piehl. The network helps show where Mark Piehl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Piehl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Piehl Line = papers co-authored together Mark Piehl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200097
2
Cultural attitudes toward weight, diet, and physical activity among overweight African American girls.
200869
3 200928
4 201125
5 200824
6 199419
7 202217
8 202412
9 202411
10 20247
11 20187
12 20205
13 20215
14 20185
15 20183
16 20182
17 20192
18 20172
19 20251
20 20191

About Mark Piehl

Mark Piehl is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (9 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (47 citations), Emergency Medicine (74 citations), Pharmacy (19 citations), General Health Professions (56 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (47 citations). Mark Piehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Conrad J. Clemens, Lori Carter‐Edwards, J.R. Hutson, Josephine Boyington, Adam J. Shapiro, Sudha R. Raman, Douglas H. Esposito, Marilyn Bookbinder, Juan Duchesne and Ellen M. Lavoie Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Infusion Nursing and Annals of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact