Mark Piehl

474 citations
21 papers · 324 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Piehl

20 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Mark Piehl
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Emergency Medicine 115
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 51
  • Pharmacy 22
  • General Health Professions 98
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 73
Replace April Kam with:
April Kam Canada
Kristin A. Shadman United States
Christian Mpody United States
Areeba Kara United States
Amy Gray Australia
Lauren Destino United States
Lindsey K. Grossman United States
Conor Hensey Ireland
Corrie E. McDaniel United States
Erica Shelton United States
Mark Piehl relative to April Kam Canada April Kam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
April Kam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Piehl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Piehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Piehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Piehl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Piehl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Piehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Piehl. The network helps show where Mark Piehl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Piehl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Piehl Line = papers co-authored together Mark Piehl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200097
2
Cultural attitudes toward weight, diet, and physical activity among overweight African American girls.
200865
3 200928
4 201125
5 200824
6 199416
7 202214
8 202411
9 20248
10 20187
11 20185
12 20205
13 20244
14 20214
15 20183
16 20192
17 20182
18 20172
19 20191
20 20251

About Mark Piehl

Mark Piehl is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (8 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (7 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers), Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (115 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (51 citations), Pharmacy (22 citations), General Health Professions (98 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (73 citations). Mark Piehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Conrad J. Clemens, Lori Carter‐Edwards, Josephine Boyington, J.R. Hutson, Sudha R. Raman, Adam J. Shapiro, Ellen M. Lavoie Smith, Peter Homel, Douglas H. Esposito and Juan Duchesne. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of Infusion Nursing, Shock, Annals of Emergency Medicine and American Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact