William Teeter

1.9k citations
58 papers · 956 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

William Teeter

52 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers

William Teeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 471
  • Emergency Medicine 301
  • Neurology 91
  • Surgery 168
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 105
Replace Jason Pasley with:
Jason Pasley United States
Michael W. Parra United States
Lance Stuke United States
Marc A. de Moya United States
Timothy C. Nuñez United States
Eric R. Snoey United States
Brigham K. Au United States
John Poularas Greece
Peter Sherren United Kingdom
Arnaud Geffroy France
William Teeter relative to Jason Pasley United States Jason Pasley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jason Pasley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Teeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Teeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Teeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Teeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Teeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Teeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Teeter. The network helps show where William Teeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Teeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Teeter Line = papers co-authored together William Teeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017117
2 2016108
3 202084
4 201781
5 201148
6 202135
7 201231
8 201730
9 201828
10 201827
11 201825
12 201823
13 201722
14 201919
15 202019
16 201818
17 201718
18 201718
19 201617
20 201916

About William Teeter

William Teeter is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (21 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (12 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (8 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (471 citations), Emergency Medicine (301 citations), Neurology (91 citations), Surgery (168 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (105 citations). William Teeter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Megan Brenner, Thomas M. Scalea, Deborah M. Stein, Peter Hu, Melanie Hoehn, Anna Romagnoli, Shiming Yang, Jason Pasley, Philip J. Wasicek and Yosuke Matsumura. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, The American Surgeon, Critical Care Medicine and Shock.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact