Mark Pichowicz
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
- Radical Photochemical Reactions
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
- Toxicology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 2
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 1
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques 1
-
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 3
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Guillaume Povie (1 shared paper)Philippe Renaud (1 shared paper)F. Dénès (1 shared paper)Robert Mokaya (2 shared papers)Nigel S. Simpkins (2 shared papers)Alexander J. Blake (2 shared papers)Claire Wilson (2 shared papers)Cédric Charrier (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Tetrahedron (2 papers)Chemical Communications (1 paper)Chemistry of Materials (1 paper)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandFrance
In The Last Decade
Mark Pichowicz
9 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Mark Pichowicz's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Organic Chemistry 798
- Toxicology 41
- Pharmaceutical Science 62
- Inorganic Chemistry 88
- Molecular Medicine 28
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pichowicz
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pichowicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pichowicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pichowicz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pichowicz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pichowicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pichowicz. The network helps show where Mark Pichowicz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pichowicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thiyl Radicals in Organic Synthesis Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 850 |
| 2 | 2001 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 3 |
About Mark Pichowicz
Mark Pichowicz is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Toxicology, Materials Chemistry and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (2 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (2 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (1 paper), Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (1 paper) and Clay minerals and soil interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (798 citations), Toxicology (41 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (62 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (88 citations) and Molecular Medicine (28 citations). Mark Pichowicz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Guillaume Povie, Philippe Renaud, F. Dénès, Robert Mokaya, Nigel S. Simpkins, Alexander J. Blake, Claire Wilson, Cédric Charrier, Andrew J. Ratcliffe and Victoria J. Savage. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron, Chemical Communications, Chemistry of Materials, Tetrahedron Letters and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.