Mark Phillips

12 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Mark Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Health 23
  • Information Systems and Management 20
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 70
Replace Christophe Olivier Schneble with:
Christophe Olivier Schneble Switzerland
C. Ranganathan United States
Inga Hunter New Zealand
Felix Gille Switzerland
Maddalena Favaretto Switzerland
Manal Almalki Saudi Arabia
Mathew S. Lopes United States
Qing Ye China
Bill Fitzgerald
Yoo Jung Oh United States
Mark Phillips relative to Christophe Olivier Schneble Switzerland Christophe Olivier Schneble's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Christophe Olivier Schneble · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Phillips. The network helps show where Mark Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mark Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Mark Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201897
2 199458
3 199446
4 202036
5 201621
6 201718
7 201818
8 201910
9
Protecting the Privacy of Canadians’ Health Information in the Cloud
20166
10 20123
11
The emergency state: its structure, power and limits
19902
12 20031

About Mark Phillips

Mark Phillips is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Physiology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 12 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Military and Defense Studies (1 paper) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (12 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations), Health (23 citations), Information Systems and Management (20 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (70 citations). Mark Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stanley A. Murrell, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Edward S. Dove, Yann Joly, Adrian Thorogood, Jan O. Korbel, David Townend, Drc Chalmers, Fruzsina Molnár‐Gábor and Dixie B. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Nature Biotechnology, Nature and IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact