Drc Chalmers

71 papers receiving 755 citations

Peers

Drc Chalmers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 399
  • Health Informatics 17
  • Physiology 227
  • Cancer Research 69
  • Genetics 138
Replace Karen J. Maschke with:
Karen J. Maschke United States
Denise M. Avard Canada
Emmanuelle Rial‐Sebbag France
Laura Lyman Rodriguez United States
Amy A. Lemke United States
Pascale Bourret France
Juli Murphy Bollinger United States
Naomi Hawkins United Kingdom
Mary Anderlik Majumder United States
Isabelle Budin‐Ljøsne Norway
Drc Chalmers relative to Karen J. Maschke United States Karen J. Maschke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Karen J. Maschke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Drc Chalmers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Drc Chalmers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drc Chalmers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drc Chalmers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Drc Chalmers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drc Chalmers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drc Chalmers. The network helps show where Drc Chalmers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Drc Chalmers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Drc Chalmers Line = papers co-authored together Drc Chalmers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201294
2 201693
3 199951
4 199842
5 202038
6 201435
7 201435
8 201231
9 201630
10 200428
11 199825
12 201025
13 199319
14 201818
15 201416
16 201813
17 200513
18 201412
19 201112
20
Human genetic research databases and biobanks: towards uniform terminology and Australian best practice.
200811

About Drc Chalmers

Drc Chalmers is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Law, General Health Professions and Cancer Research, having authored 80 papers that have together received 828 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (40 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (38 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Legal principles and applications (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (5 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (399 citations), Health Informatics (17 citations), Physiology (227 citations), Cancer Research (69 citations) and Genetics (138 citations). Drc Chalmers has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dianne Nicol, Margaret F. A. Otlowski, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Christine R. Critchley, Edward S. Dove, Martin Bobrow, R. E. Schmidt, Xingzhu Zhang and Philip N. Pettit. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, European Journal of Human Genetics, New Genetics and Society and Medical Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact