Mark Pearson

18 papers receiving 155 citations

Peers

Mark Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Language and Linguistics 41
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
  • Linguistics and Language 14
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 11
Replace Marianne Lind with:
Marianne Lind Norway
Danielle Jones United Kingdom
Valantis Fyndanis Norway
Firle Beckley United Kingdom
İlknur Maviş Türkiye
David Azul Australia
Valeria Darò Italy
Sarah Hamilton United States
Mária Gósy Hungary
Jeremy K. Boyd United States
Mark Pearson relative to Marianne Lind Norway Marianne Lind's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marianne Lind · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pearson. The network helps show where Mark Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198263
2 201824
3
An introduction to a sample time-series of abyssal macrobenthos - methods and principle sources of variability
198015
4 202212
5 20209
6 20238
7 20208
8 19828
9
How Can Poetry Support the Understanding of Psychotic Experiences? - A Conceptual Review.
20207
10 20205
11 20234
12 20243
13 20233
14 20223
15 20192
16 20241
17 20171
18 20241
19 20251
20 20210

About Mark Pearson

Mark Pearson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Conservation, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Mental Health via Writing (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and Art Therapy and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), Language and Linguistics (41 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (45 citations), Linguistics and Language (14 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (11 citations). Mark Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and China. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey Beattie, Anne Cutler, Gemma Stacey, C. J. Darwin, Tim Carter, Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, Gary Winship, Paul Crawford, Prerna Singh and Kerry Evans. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Nurse Education in Practice, Nursing Philosophy, PLoS ONE and Speech Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact